A Comparative Analysis of Traditional Costing Method with ABC Costing Essay

A Comparative Analysis of traditional damageing Method with ABC Costing Method - Essay Example(Charles T. Horngren p150) Manufacturing company only produced a few types and high quantities of products before, traditional existing method which focused on direct salutes were untold more important than the end product overheads, traditional costing would be accurate before While the production structure has changed, the times demand that flexibility and love of change replaced absorption costing method in Manufacturing company. Our company is a Manufacturing company. The company has a processing system that is used to manufacture two products Hinkels and Quirts. Cost drivers are the real factors that decide the cost incurred and the resource consumed. Unlike the traditional method plagued by inaccuracy in manufacturing overheads apportioning, ABC need not adopt two-stage cost allocation process to figure out the each(prenominal) target cost, in order to achieve cost information a ccuracy. Therefore, ABC adopts multi activities to distribute costs. It demonstrates that choosing proper cost drivers is the most important and key step. In practice the ABC system uses many drivers as allocation bases in the second stage of the cost allocation system whereas the traditional cost systems tend to use, at the most, two second-stage allocation bases. (Colin Drury, 2002, p298)II. ABC process Activity- found costing has the following five stepsa. Identify the disparate activities performed by the business.b. Calculate the total cost of each activity over the financial period(cost pool)c. Identify a cost driver (i.e. a causation factor) for each activity.d. Calculate the cost driver rate(i.e. the average cost of one occurrence of the cost driver)e. Assign part of the cost each activity to different products based to the extent to which each product has caused the activity to occur (i.e.