King oedipus analysis Essay Example for Free

queen regnant oedipus analysis EssayDestiny and Freewill This is one of the close important themes in the shirk and leaves the reader with the engrossing question of whether or non freewill is an illusion. The exploit doesnt actually answer this question, but it shows the complex inter athletics of fate and freewill that culminates in Oedipus tragic plight. Jocasta, Laius and Oedipus all soften to escape the prophecy but they are unwittingly led into their seemingly unavoidable fate. This element of the play is intended to show the reader the business leader of prophecy and the supreme authority of the gods in contrast with the futility of valet beings. The play also shows how hu mankind nature plays a vital role in the fulfilment of the prophecy. favor and pity on the shepherds behalf prevents Oedipus from dying as a baby. Oedipus protest impetuous temper results in the polish off of his own father, Laius. His indorsementary display of in communicateigence in solving the riddle is his ultimate triumph as well as his seed of destruction as it results in nuptials to his mother, Jocasta. In resolving to move up out the truth about his birth, he brings the suffering on himself. His arrogant, taunting attitude towards Teirisias further exposes the awful truth.In this way, the play shows how freewill also contributes to Oedipus grimfall. Pride and humility Pride is Oedipus fatal flaw his self-reliance towards both the gods and clement beings leads to his destruction. Sophocles probably intended to teach people the importance of humility and recognising the superiority of the gods that they believed in. Oedipus arrogance is displayed in his long, speeches and in the hot-headed way he unknowingly killed his father. His initial refusal to accept any blame or wrongdoing on his part shows that he has a high opinion of himself.One of the main sources of his gazump is his defeat of the Sphinx, which saved Thebes and put him on the throne, and as ye t the reader knows that this was also the cause of one of his foulest crimes, marriage to his mother. In this way, the playwright communicates a message about the folly of taking human achievement to a fault seriously. Because of this, the play is not very humanistic but belittles human beings as futile and flawed. Wisdom and ignorance The involution between Teirisias and Oedipus represents the conflict between wisdom and ignorance, Teirisias being wisdom and Oedipus being ignorance.Teirisias comment To be able is to suffer is ironic because it comes true for Oedipus. When he learns the truth about himself and becomes wise, he is in utmost agony. The play shows that perhaps having cognition is not necessarily a good thing, as Teirisias warns, and that t present are limitations to our knowledge that we should accept. Sight and blindness Teirisia is a blind seer, which sounds like a contradiction in terms. However, even though he is physically blind, he has the insight and knowledg e, which Oedipus lacks. When Oedipus finally gains this insight at the end of the play, he blinds himself physically.throughout the play, Oedipus is blinded by his own arrogance, shown in his refusal to accept that he is the cause of Thebes misery. Living in never-ending night, you disregardnot harm me, or any man else that sees the light. His deliberate disbelief enables him to issue the curse, never considering that it might need himself in the end. Oedipus is also blind to his true position in relation to the gods. He believes he can thwart prophecy and outsmart the gods. The attitude he displays shows that he has almost made himself a god, who has the power to curse and demand whatever knowledge he seeks.Humility Sophocles certainly agrees with this contention in his play, King Oedipus. The character of Creon who is more cautious is intended to contrast with Oedipus impetuous arrogance. It is Oedipus lack of humility that causes much of his own suffering. On the other hand, Creons more careful approach to life evades a potentially disastrous maculation when Oedipus accuses him of conspiracy. Characters Oedipus Oedipus is willing to help the people of Thebes. I would gladly do anything to help you. He is actively have-to doe with with his city.I have not thought it fit to rely on my messengers, but am here to learn for myself Arrogant proud of his own abilities such as solving the riddle of the sphinx. Until I came I, unknowing Oedipus, came and stopped the riddlers mouth, guessing the truth by mother-wit, not bird-lore. Sympathetic towards the city of Thebes I grieve for you my children. retrieve me, I know all that you desire of me, all that you suffer and while you suffer none suffers more than I. Jumps to conclusions about the ones closest to him. He accuses Creon of conspiring to take over the throne.Must Creon, so long my friend, my most sure friend, stalk me by stealth and study to dispossess me of the power that this city has given to me He assumes that Jocasta fears that he was an illegitimate child. The woman, with more than womans pride, is shamed by my low origin. Easily angered, irascible especially by Teiresias bald scoundrel Shameless and brainless, sightless, senseless sot Steadfast and staunch in his quest to expose the truth. meaninglessness I essential pursue this trail to the end, till I have unravelled the mystery of my birth. Not a fatalist expresses the belief that chance rules our lives. Acts as the mediator between Oedipus and Creon, typical of her role as a mother and wife. What is the meaning of this loud argument, you quarrelsome men? You are making much of some indifferent grievance. Abandons Oedipus on the hillside to perish because of prophecy yet dismisses prophecy later in the play. For I can tell you, no man possesses the secret of divination. And I have proof Why should you then, heed them for a moment? and A fig for divination Cannot face the horror of the truth and dies at her own handsCreon A contrast to Oedipus in terms of character. He is calmer and more reasonable. Reason with yourself, as I and ask, would any man exchange a quiet life, with royal rank assured, for an uneasy throne? He is more low-down and cautious- I do not presume to say more than I know, and acknowledges the gods God will decide, not I. He is deeply hurt by Oedipus accusations If he thinks that I have done him any harm, by word or act, in this calamitous hour, I will not live Teiresias Physically blind, yet gifted with second sight (prophecy).All heavenly and earthly knowledge are in your grasp. In your heart, if not with eye, you see our citys condition. Reluctant to share his knowledge with Oedipus because he knows the damage it will cause. When wisdom brings no profit, to be wise is to suffer. Laius He is only mentioned through other people in the play. Shepherd standardised Teiresias to impart his knowledge until threatened. Oedipus terrorizes, Answer If I must speak again, you die He also serves to incarnate Oedipus greatest fears. Chorus Represents the voice of the elders as well as the general public.It comments on the action in the play, sometimes siding with Oedipus, other times questioning his actions and words. They are the voice of religious belief, more than at one time urging the need to heed the words of the gods. I only ask to live, with pure faith retentivity in word and deed that Law which leaps the sky, made of no mortal mould whose living nobleman does not age or die. It is at times philosophical, commenting on the nature of existence and the frailty of human attainment and success. All the generations of mortal man add up to nothing Show me the man whose blessedness was anything more than an illusion followed by disillusion.Here is the instance, here is Oedipus, here is the reason why I will call no mortal creature happy Then learn that mortal man must always look to his ending. And none can be called happy until t hat day when he carries his happiness down to the grave in peace. Symbols Sight and blindness this is used as a metaphor for knowledge and ignorance. linguistic context The play was written during the Classical period in Ancient Greece in the 5th century BC, a time of optimistic humanism. Sophocles tends to celebrate humanity but also plea for adherence to justice, moderation and the gods.